Jump to content

Hunter Harvey touches 96 MPH in Spring appearance


Slade-OH

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Hunter Harvey with a 96 mph fastball to Margot <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a></p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">March 7, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Granted, it's one inning of work in an exhibition game but sounds like Hunter Harvey made a nice impression today. Also, very impressive and encouraging that he's already touching 96 mph this early in the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a velocity curve of any sort for pitchers? I'm sure it depends on body type/delivery, so maybe it's not really a simple question. Just wondering if there is a normal progression... Like, a guy that hits 96 at age 20 can look to get to 98 by 24. Or something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a velocity curve of any sort for pitchers? I'm sure it depends on body type/delivery, so maybe it's not really a simple question. Just wondering if there is a normal progression... Like, a guy that hits 96 at age 20 can look to get to 98 by 24. Or something like that.

If a guy is throwing 96 at 20 he will be throwing 94 by 24.

Most pitchers start losing velocity pretty quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it generally is all decline by the time a guy hits the majors?

No, not at all. Improvement or decline of velocity depends on a lot of things including body type, arm speed, role, and coaching adjustments. Velocity usually peaks in the 21-24 year old range though some young pitchers appear to "lose" velocity because they've learned to stop throwing to the radar gun and start throwing to spots. Hunter could very well gain velocity as the lower half of his body fills out. As a tall, lanky kid, he did not have a mature body when he was drafted so the Orioles felt there was more velocity in there.

If a pitcher "loses" velocity between 20 and 24 it's most likely because he's pitching rather than throwing instead of some physical situation. The one thing to remember with high school pitchers with mature bodies who threw in the mid to upper 90s as an amateur is that there are no performance enhancement drug testing in high school. There has been a lot of talk of young kids taking huge jumps in velocity, getting the big contracts, then suddenly losing velocity in the pros once they can be tested. Coincidence, perhaps, but something to think about when a kid shows up in pro ball and has lost 3-4 MPH off his high school fastball.

Clearly this is not an issue with Harvey since he's added velocity since going pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, not at all. Improvement or decline of velocity depends on a lot of things including body type, arm speed, role, and coaching adjustments. Velocity usually peaks in the 21-24 year old range though some young pitchers appear to "lose" velocity because they've learned to stop throwing to the radar gun and start throwing to spots. Hunter could very well gain velocity as the lower half of his body fills out. As a tall, lanky kid, he did not have a mature body when he was drafted so the Orioles felt there was more velocity in there.

If a pitcher "loses" velocity between 20 and 24 it's most likely because he's pitching rather than throwing instead of some physical situation. The one thing to remember with high school pitchers with mature bodies who threw in the mid to upper 90s as an amateur is that there are no performance enhancement drug testing in high school. There has been a lot of talk of young kids taking huge jumps in velocity, getting the big contracts, then suddenly losing velocity in the pros once they can be tested. Coincidence, perhaps, but something to think about when a kid shows up in pro ball and has lost 3-4 MPH off his high school fastball.

Clearly this is not an issue with Harvey since he's added velocity since going pro.

Could an exaggerated or hot HS gun be just as possible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am more concerned with how much movement is on his ball?

100 MPH with no movement, gets hammered out of the ball onto Eutaw Street at 200 MPH.

We had a lefty reliever here, many years ago, nice guy, great hardfast ball, but no movement, and hitters had no problem picking it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am more concerned with how much movement is on his ball?

100 MPH with no movement, gets hammered out of the ball onto Eutaw Street at 200 MPH.

We had a lefty reliever here, many years ago, nice guy, great hardfast ball, but no movement, and hitters had no problem picking it up.

Good old Brad Pennington...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Saves are about the stupidest thing to base reliever pay on.  Ok you probably won't have your worst reliever pitching the 9th, but pitching the 9th w/ a 3 run lead is probably one of the easiest reliever jobs.
    • I'm wondering if Gunnar would be interested in a 8 year/$250 mill extension.  He would still hit free agency at 30.  Also he could have the option of taking player option for 5 years/$200 mill if he had top 5 MVP finish in year 5-8 (is this kind of opion even legal by MLB rules?)
    • Honestly it's been kind of a useless roster spot, so I don't know that they really care about performance. No matter who it is in this roster spot, they won't play a lot so they're not looking for them to make a big offensive impact. 
    • I really like watching Burnes pitch. And yet, I’ve never gone back and forth so much on a possible contract offer for him than any other player. Dude deserves to be paid, I just keep thinking the price tag and years is simply too much. It’s fear of injury and potentially paying another guy well after he stops playing baseball. If the Elias and crew want to make a run at him, I’ll certainly roll with it. I guess we will know more about how deep our pockets actually are after this season.
    • Westburg batting #4 isn't your typical clean up hitter, but he does 2 things well enough that it's probably going to be consistently effective. 1. He has a high average with runners in scoring position. 2. If the 1st 3 batter fail, he'll be good at leading of the 2nd inning. Bonus: He's got some pop in his bat so once in a while he can do what traditional cleanup hitters do. I love how versatile and consistent Jordan Westburg is.
    • I hope we extend Henderson and Adley at the All-Star break this year. Rubenstein can show that the Orioles are sitting at the big boy table now. They are some of the best players in MLB and should be getting paid.       
    • To me, it's more about offensive inconsistency game to game. I don't do the research that many others on here do, I just go off of what I see and feel. And I feel like this offense is very inconsistent and it's an all or nothing approach. There's been back and forths on social media about whether the lack of walks is going to hurt this team long term especially in the post season. In addition to the walks it's the impatience on many nights that drives me crazy. Also, the lack of station to station baseball. Last night, I felt like it was nothing but attack attack attack.. clearly after a couple innings this approach was not working so why not change it up a bit? And also, no one is talking about that after we got Gray out of the game, we didn't do jack **** against their bullpen. The bullpen guys (excluding Hensley) do not have Gray "stuff". So what's the explanation for why we didn't even have a hit after we knocked Gray out? If these trends continue, yes, we may not get swept (because we'll hit enough HRs), but it'll be difficult to rattle off long winning streaks which unless they fall apart due to injury, will make it difficult to keep up with and overtake NY (they just won 7 in a row and like 10 of 13?).
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...